Archive for the ‘Investing Outlook’ Category

Utilizing Investor Sentiment for the Green Investor

Thursday, August 26th, 2010

Too few individual investors how to use Investor Sentiment to their advantage.    Last week when the New York Times ran a front page story regarding individual investors fleeing equity mutual funds in favor of bond mutual funds, it should have made any long term Socially Responsible Investor giddy with glee.

Why?

Extreme negative sentiment as depicted in the NY Times should be used as an inverse barometer of when to invest.  However, more often group think sets in and investor is intimidated by being the lone wolf buying shares while the herd is stampeding in the other direction.

Right now, sentiment as expressed by the American Association of Individual Investors is getting extremely negative….and thats a good thing.   Who’s left to sell when only 21% of members polled are positive on the markets?  21% happens to be one of the lowest polls recorded in the past 15 years.   You may be right in your views of why you want to sell…….but, and this is the tricky part that the majority of investors never learn to master:  You may be right in your thesis but if you’re in the majority with your views, chances are your opinions have already been absorbed by the markets.

Using data supplied by www.sentimentrader.com:

Since 1987, there have been 47 instances where AAII sentiment fell to 21% or below.  The results are:

3 months later: the average return was 5.8% for the S&P 500 with 98% of the 47 instances positive.

6 months later: the average return was 10.9% for the S&P 500 with 91% of the 47 instances positive.

In conclusion, many investors think they can manage their assets completely on their own but unfortunately do not know how to interpret sentiment data.  Going against the herd is never easy but you must be able to master your emotions in order to be a successful investor, otherwise you might consider hiring an adviser who’s weathered a great many storms in their career.


Deflation / Double Dip still not the baseline projection

Thursday, August 19th, 2010

More chatter about the Double Dip recession this morning, despite the building proof that the DD is not a likely outcome.   Apparently Mr. Market has not taken his Wellbutrin this morning, so we sell off.

This morning Credit Suisse published a research note between the differences in our economy at present versus Japan in the late 80′s and 90′s.

The U.S. is not Japan 15 years ago. We find many more differences than similarities between the U.S. today and Japan 15 years ago:

  1. The U.S. has had far more proactive fiscal/monetary policy. (Japanese monetary conditions were tight until 1995. Unlike the U.S. today, Japan fiscal easing was small.)
  2. Japan had falling wages since 1997 and negative inflation expectations since 1993. (U.S. wage growth and inflation expectations are >2%.) Falling wages creates sustained deflation.
  3. Asset deflation was more acute in Japan, with house prices declining by almost 80% in the big cities.
  4. The U.S. moved to recapitalize banks quickly and has already written down 85% of their estimated losses (Japan needed 13 years.)
  5. Japan was very slow to deregulate, and hence the price of labor fell as opposes to the quantity. With companies having little incentive to maximize return on equity, the return on capital is one-third that of the U.S.
  6. Deflation became economically and politically acceptable because Japanese households have net financial assets of 41% of GDP, so they benefit from deflation.

If this remains the case, its quite bullish for equities although the road will likely be bumpy and a potential for a major bubble in US bonds, especially Treasuries.

No Positions

Brad Pappas

Congratulations kiddo!

Thursday, August 19th, 2010

Congrats kiddo on your first day at the University of Colorado!

Lotsa love,
Dad aka The Checkbook

Industrial Production should make you think Treasury bonds are Bubblicious

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

It wasn’t supposed to be this way, the Double Dip Recession and inevitable Deflation were a sure thing, but today’s Industrial Production figures of growth of 1% in July versus the consensus of .7% make want to give you pause if you’re loading up on Treasuries.  The figures were led by a big 9.9% surge in motor vehicles, the trend in vehicle production is the most since 1984 while year to year PPI growth is the greatest since 1998.

While this data is very good news for equities its quite bearish for Treasury bonds which are probably leaning too much to the side of buying exuberance.

Consider the following charts from SentimenTrader.com, all three show far too much bullish sentiment to make a potential investment profitable.   Investment profits are very seldom made when sentiment is so extreme as the data suggests it’s likely wiser to be a seller rather than a buyer.

These remain very uncertain times but we feel its in error to chase strength, let any market correct itself where you can make your buys on your terms not the market’s.

Allow me to put this another way:  With the yield on the 10-year Treasury now at 2.58% it has a P/E (Price divided by Earnings) of 38.7 which is quite close to the bubble era for the NASDAQ in 1999.   The current P/E of the S&P 500 is now 12.

Be careful out there

Brad Pappas

The Bounty of the Balance Sheet

Monday, August 16th, 2010

With the economy fluctuating between a glass half full one week and bone dry the next we continue to focus on Value and special situations based upon our equity model.  For all practical purposes its impossible to predict where the economy will be in a year, but we do know that this period in our history corporations have rock solid with frequent over capitalized balance sheets (lots of cash, little debt) while the consumer continues to de-leverage from decades of over consumption (which will take years).

Value continues to be exploited in the markets as one of our long term holdings Sports Supply Group has been acquired by private equity firm ONCAP LP,  shareholders will be receiving cash in lieu of stock.  This marks the third holding of ours in 2010 that has either been acquired, subject of a hostile takeover or considering sale of the company.   Asset rich companies make attractive targets since the cash on the books is quantifiable and frequently the underlying business can be acquired for little or nothing.  Frequently these companies are the targets for Value investors who love nothing more than predictable and boring companies in sleepy industries with hairless balance sheets.

Present market weakness has pressured the price of Audiovox symbol VOXX to an excellent entry point here at $6.55.  VOXX has approximately $330 million in current assets and $118 million in total liabilities which net to $212 million but the market value is $148 million.   The $64 million dollar difference with 18.5 million shares outstanding or $3.45 per share is a rock solid Margin of Safety to the patient investor willing to wait for the value to move in excess of the balance sheet.  The stock holds the potential for a 50% or more rate of return assuming the balance sheet remains intact.

VOXX has been around since 1965 and makes some of the coolest audio equipment in the world but it isn’t always profitable.  Earning expectations for 2010 are in the .35 per share range but the estimate is from only one analyst.

Products are marketed under the Audiovox brand name along with other brands such as Acoustic Research, Advent, RCA, Jenson, Road Gear and Spikemaster.

One aspect that caught our eye was the list of investors who own significant stakes in VOXX:  Seth Klarman of Baupost Group, George Soros and Irving Kahn.

We expect owning shares of VOXX to be a long term investment, investors should have a multiyear expectation.   It is the type of stock that you could rest easy when you go on that multi-year sabbatical to the Amazon.

Others may want to wring their hands with the potential for deflation, however with investor angst so high at the moment reflects that much of the deflation debate may be baked in the cake of the market for the interim, hence the potential for significant values is quite good.

Be careful out there.

Brad Pappas

Long VOXX